|
by Tom Cantrell
Start ı Oops
ı Once More, With Feeling ı Optical
Options ı Have It Your, and Our, Way
ı Lesson Learned ı Sources
and PDF
OOPS
I shouldıve known better. The history
of technology demonstrates that a better mousetrap doesnıt necessarily
mean overnight success. Iım reminded of one of the best (and worst)
examples as I peck away at my QWERTY keyboard, a brain-damaged holdover
from the last century. Things do change, but sometimes the pace is
a little slower than mere technical considerations might imply.
So, what happened to MiniDisc? In hindsight,
there were a number of factors that held it back. Certainly retailers
werenıt excited about juggling yet another new media. Remember that
at the time, all the audio/video outlets were finally clearing out
the last vestiges of audiocassettes and no doubt looking forward to
unifying their racks around CDs.
As usual, audiophiles had concerns about
the audio quality of the MD psycho-acoustic compression scheme. Sony
went as far as to hold a number of blind "taste" tests comparing
CD to MD, which seemed to back up their claims that MD could hold
its own. Indeed, at the time it was reported that for those listeners
who could detect a difference, more preferred MD, even with its 5:1
compression, over CD. Nevertheless, we all know how finicky folks
can get about audio, so whether justified or not, the concern may
have played a role.
I suspect controversy over copy protection
didnıt help. The MD incorporated a serial copy management scheme that,
as I recall, would allow you to make a digital copy of a CD to a MD,
but not subsequent digital copies of that MD. Even today, the issue
of audio/video copy protection is still a hot button.
Perhaps in an effort to alleviate, or
at least pay a way around, those copy-protection concerns, the pricing
of blank media was set quite high, only 20% or so less than a prerecorded
title. Good for the artists whose works were so protected, but ultimately
bad for MD.
Even at the time I wrote the article,
Iıd questioned Sonyıs strategy of driving MD in the consumer audio/video
space while appearing to ignore its possibilities as a data storage
alternative. Remember, in ı93 most folks were still using floppies
or tapes as backup, because today's ZIP, MO, CD-RW, and such alternatives
were still in their infancy.
Eventually Sony did make a half-hearted
effort to promote what they called Data MD, but it was too little,
too late. I still wonder whether or not pushing MD initially in computers,
a market proven to be amenable to adopting new gadgets quickly, and
then audio after a beachhead was established, would have made a difference
in the outcome.
PREVIOUS
NEXT
Circuit Cellar
provides up-to-date information for engineers. Visit www.circuitcellar.com
for more information and additional articles.
For subscription information, call (860) 875-2199, subscribe@circuitcellar.com
or subscribe
online. ıCircuit Cellar, the Magazine for Computer Applications.
Posted with permission.
|