|
Part 2: Reducing the Risk
by George Novacek
Start ı Passive
Components ı The Future ı The
Tradeoff ı Sources and PDF
Last month, I gave you some theory on
designs operating at elevated temperatures and the risk involved.
At high temperatures, you start getting into an area where regular
solder will melt and insulation will disintegrate. Such concerns for
high-temperature operation are what Iıd like to discuss this month.
You may find their inner workings fascinating,
but unless you work for a semiconductor manufacturer, you have little
influence on their specifications and are stuck with what you can
buy off the distributorsı shelves. Faced with the need to operate
at an elevated temperature, are there suitable devices available on
the market, or is there something else you can do?
National Semiconductors produces the
LH0021-200, a 1-A power amp in a TO3 metal package rated for ı65ıC
to 200ıC operation. Several other big names (Honeywell and International
Rectifier, to name just two), produce devices rated well above 125ıC,
but some are derated to zero power dissipation at the maximum temperature,
so read the specifications carefully. Needless to say, their prices
may be staggering. But, donıt lose heart. Youıve already seen that
commercial TTL and CMOS devices have been successfully tested at temperatures
above their specified limit. You can select devices you will need
for a project and characterize them for high-temperature operation
yourself.
In his book, High Temperature Electronics,
F. Patrick McCluskey gives an example of pushing a common variety
IR power MOSFET IRF044 into an operating environment it was never
designed for. [1] This device is rated for 60 V and 30 A at a case
temperature of 25ıC. Its on-resistance is a 28-milliohm maximum at
Tj = 25ıC. The power dissipation is derated linearly to
zero at the case temperature TC = 175ıC. To characterize
this MOSFET, the breakdown voltage, leakage current, on-resistance,
and VGTH were measured and plotted over the ambient temperature
range from 20ıC to 200ıC. The breakdown voltage measured at 200ıC
was 77.5 V, and the on-resistance doubled. The leakage increased from
approximately 0.5 nA to 1.1 mA, a whopping six orders of magnitude,
but the absolute value of 1.1 mA was still respectable and reasonable
to work with. And, the VGTH decreased from 2.92 V to 1.75
V at 200ıC.
The DC/DC converter shown in Figure 1
with 28-VDC input and 42-VDC/117-W output was built using the above
MOSFETs together with similarly characterized additional components.
The converter delivered continuous 42 V/117 W with 88.7% efficiency
at 200ıC ambient temperature for 1000 h without a glitch, at which
point the test was terminated. Diodes D1, D2, D5, and D6 could be
the intrinsic MOSFET diodes, but in his book, McCluskey cites a slight
improvement in efficiency when using discrete devices. The output
voltage of the converter is stepped up using transformer T1, with
L1 and C3 not only being the output filter, but also helping to achieve
zero-crossing switching of the MOSFETs at the arbitrarily selected
25-kHz switching frequency. To drive home the point that high-temperature
operation is not exclusively a semiconductor problem, teflon-coated
wires and solderless nickel-plated terminals were used to interconnect
the components, which were equipped with hefty heatsinks to minimize
the temperature rise of their junctions above ambient.
| Figure
1ıHere you can see a simplified schematic of a 28/42-VDC,
117-W converter using off-the-shelf commercial components successfully
operating at 200ıC. |
Characterization of components for high-temperature
operation is not the only challenge. No less important is choosing
the right circuit topology. The junction, not the ambient temperature
is the limiting factor, so besides making sure you can compensate
shifts in characteristics caused by temperature changes, you must
minimize internal dissipation to keep the junction temperature rise
above the ambient temperature as low as possible.
Internal heat dissipation is caused by
losses. Remember how I talked about the conduction losses, which are
ohmic in nature, proportional to the voltage drop across the junction?
To minimize them, devices with low on-resistance operated at the lowest
currents possible and minimum leakage must be used. Because leakage
increases with temperature, which in turn increases leakage, the danger
of thermal runaway always looms in the background.
On the other hand, switching losses are
dynamic in nature and result from the simultaneous presence of voltage
and current during on and off switching of the semiconductors. To
reduce losses, this hard switching has to be changed to soft switching,
meaning switching at the point where the voltage and current are both
zero. This is achieved by turning the conventional PWM (pulse-width
modulated) converters into resonant switches by adding inductors,
capacitors, and diodes. The reduction of the switching losses comes
at the expense of the peak voltage and current the components must
be able to handle. Figure 2 is an example of a common boost converter
using an IGBT. The extra C1, L2, and D2 facilitate zero current switching
to minimize switching losses. This 28/42-V, 100-W converter was also
successfully operated at 200ıC. The test circuit used Unitrodeıs UC1860
controller IC.
| Figure
2ıThe boost-switching regulator can be built to operate
reliably at 200ıC. The extra inductor, capacitor, and diode
(usually not used) serve to provide zero current switching. |
NEXT
Circuit Cellar provides up-to-date information for engineers. Visit
www.circuitcellar.com for
more information and additional articles.
For subscription information, call (860) 875-2199, subscribe@circuitcellar.com
or subscribe online.
ıCircuit Cellar, the Magazine for Computer Applications. Posted with
permission. |