|
by Tom Cantrell
Start ı BalkLANization
ı Pain in the Pan ı Whatıs
All the Buzz About? ı Rock Around the Clock
ı Sources and PDF
PAIN IN THE PAN
In "BluetruthıHouston, We Have a
Problemı" (Circuit Cellar 134) I took a few pointed jabs
at the hype balloon surrounding Bluetooth. While recognizing the marketing
momentum coupled with a generic need for a low-end (i.e., sub-802.11)
RF standard, I lamented the cost and complexity, not to mention the
wishful thinking forecasts from Bluetooth zealots. Iım not dissing
the clever folks behind the scheme. Itıs more a matter of their particular
perspective and perhaps biting off a bit more than silicon and application
providers can chew.
I can see Bluetooth slowly but surely
making its way into cell phones, PDAs, notebook PCs, and other gadgets
in the modern road warriorıs arsenal. True believers would have the
Bluetooth radio in their shoes ring their cell phone to tell them
their shoe is untied. But, what about simple blue-collar household
and industrial applications such as meter reading, security, HVAC,
sensors, actuators, and such? Consider something as simple as the
thermostat controlling your furnace.
The last house I lived in had the thermostat
mounted near the front entryway. That meant that leaving the door
open for more than a few seconds, especially on a cool windy day,
would invariably trigger a generally unneeded and inevitably short-lived
and wasteful heat cycle.
Iıd often contemplated moving it somewhere
practical, but I never got over the hump of stringing wire through
the attic and poking holes in the wall. Just what the world needs,
a wireless peel-and-stick thermostat with no installation skill or
effort required beyond deciding where you want it and easily moving
it when you change your mind.
For an application such as this, Bluetooth
is both under- and over-kill. At about 1 Mbps, Bluetooth comes with
laughably more bandwidth than required. Furthermore, most of the protocol
complexity needed to deal with Bluetoothıs presumption of mobility
and ad-hoc connectivity is unnecessary. The thermostat has no need
to be continually on the lookout for new devices, service discovery,
and all the rest. And needless to say, battery life needs to be measured
in months or years, not weeks or days.
Yes, long-term, full-production volumes
will push Bluetooth costs down. But, even the still mythical $5 target
touted by advocates is too much baggage for a $20 to $30 retail item
to carry. As it stands today, a typical Bluetooth implementation demands
a 32-bit CPU and a bunch of memory for baseband processing, in addition
to the radio itself. Iım all for the march of silicon, but I must
say the idea of needing so much horsepower just to get a few bits
from here to there does offend my engineering sensibilities.
PREVIOUS
NEXT
Circuit Cellar
provides up-to-date information for engineers. Visit www.circuitcellar.com
for more information and additional articles.
For subscription information, call (860) 875-2199, subscribe@circuitcellar.com
or subscribe
online. ıCircuit Cellar, the Magazine for Computer Applications.
Posted with permission.
|