|
by Tom Cantrell
Start ı Whatıs
a nV Between Friends? ı All Greek To Me
ı Bank Heist ı More
For Less ı Sources and PDF
In the age-old battle against bloat,
the hardware wizards seem to be holding their own. I think this is
one explanation for the slowdown in PC sales. For many years, hardware
had trouble keeping up with the corpulence of software, forcing users
onto a PC-upgrade path just to keep up.
But now there are so many MIPS and megs
that even programmers who never met a feature they didnıt like are
hard-pressed to soak them up. Indeed, Iım probably not alone in admitting
that even my three-year-old PC has so much horsepower I canıt recall
exactly whatıs under the hood.
Letıs see, Programs->Accessories->System
Tools->System Information dutifully reports that Iım getting
by with a mere Pentium II at 300 MHz. I suppose I should feel a bit
wimpy what with all the gigahertz buzz Iıve been hearing, but the
fact is, my PC keeps up with my typing just fine. The only time I
ever notice a processing bottleneck is when Iım running engineering
software (Xilinx Foundation place and route comes to mind), but I
donıt do that often enough to feel compelled to make an upgrade.
I thought I had 32 MB of RAM, but it
says I have 64 MB. That makes me feel better. Of course, because my
PC supposedly has virtual memory, I suppose Iıll never see an actual
"Out of Memory" message. At least, Iıve never noticed my
disk having any VM swapping convulsions.
Speaking of disk, SysInfo says I still
have about half of my 8-GB space free. I probably only use about 1
GB of stuff (mainly Word, Explorer, and Outlook) on a daily basis.
However, writing for Circuit Cellar does involve picking up
a lot of clutter such as demo tool suites and oh-so-many VIPs (Very
Important (at-one-time) PDFs). Maybe there will come a day when Iıll
have to do some housecleaning or be more choosy about the stuff I
download, but until then, the more the merrier.
Weıre sitting pretty on the desktop,
but what about the real world? Well, it looks like the embedded hardware
wizards are doing a number, too. For instance, there was a time when
8- or 10 bits of resolution for an ADC was considered upscale. Nowadays,
thatıs practically standard equipment on even the lowliest MCU.
Next came 12-bit ADCs and then, fueled
by digital audio, 16-, 18-, and 20-bit ADCs. Surely thatıs enough
to handle most blue-collar data acquisition tasks, right?
NEXT
Circuit Cellar
provides up-to-date information for engineers. Visit www.circuitcellar.com
for more information and additional articles.
For subscription information, call (860) 875-2199, subscribe@circuitcellar.com
or subscribe
online. ıCircuit Cellar, the Magazine for Computer Applications.
Posted with permission.
|