|
by Tom Cantrell
Start ı Letıs
Rumble ı Once More, With Feeling ı Layer
It On Me ı Plug-In Possibilities ı Ready
Or Not ı Sources and PDF
Over the years, and especially recently
as the stakes have gotten higher, Silicon Valley hasıhow shall I put
it?ımatured in the ways of the world. Cozier ties with Washington
are all the rage, as protection against Feds, who might come-a-calling
with subpoenas, search warrants, or heaven forbid, handcuffs. There
are more lobbyists in suits than suits in the lobby or, for that matter,
in the lab.
Although Silicon Valley always pushed
the marketing envelope, the art of spin is being refined, rising to
the pro level in DC, where a decrease in growth is a cut, pork is
an investment, and no oneıs quite sure just what the meaning of "is"
is.
So, on one hand, we read favorable reports,
such as: "Intel believes that IEEE 1394 enables the PC to add
tremendous value to consumer electronics devices," said Patrick Gelsinger,
Vice President and General Manager of Intel's Desktop Products Group.
"Broad deployment of IEEE 1394 requires reasonable licensing terms
around this technology, and Intel is very pleased to join these companies
in driving to that goal" (www.1394ta.org).
Only to find that Gelsinger takes another
stance in an EE Times article, written by Rick Boyd-Merritt.
There he says, "We expect 1394 will play a role in connecting
consumer electronics devices to the computer which can enhance those
devices, but that's something of a niche, and it doesn't make sense
to integrate that into our chip sets" (www.eetimes.com/story/OEG19990224S0015).
Now, itıs not uncommon in the world of
spin for yesterdayıs story to be declared inoperative. But in this
case, I donıt think itıs simply a change of mind. Instead, I think
weıre seeing the initial diplomatic posturing in whatıs going to turn
into a full-fledged shooting war between IEEE 1394 and USB 2.0. I
suspect the spinning has just begun.
Although the USB 2.0 spec wonıt be public
until later this year, whatıs known so far is that it targets much
higher speeds of 120 and 240 Mbps (and possibly even higher). No doubt,
the move is in response to complaints from mouse manufacturers that
the current USB 1.1 speed of 1.2 and 12 Mbps isnıt enough to keep
up with power point-and-clickers.
NEXT
Circuit Cellar provides up-to-date information for engineers. Visit
www.circuitcellar.com for
more information and additional articles.
For subscription information, call (860) 875-2199, subscribe@circuitcellar.com
or subscribe online.
ıCircuit Cellar, the Magazine for Computer Applications. Posted with
permission. |