|
 |


Brian
Elfman is President & CEO of Certified Devices Inc. (CDI)
in San Leandro, California. He is the founder of a public
Silicon Valley technology company (CAERE Corp. NASDAQ).
His engineering design background spans the era of discrete
transistor logic to the transition of ICs. In each of his
companies, he has filled the roles of President, leading-edge
market visionary, and principal product designer. He has
raised both venture capital and private financing for his
companies. In the main, he generally has designed and built
products first in their field. Click
here to read Mr. Elfman's complete bio. If you would
like to ask Brian a question or simply give comment, click
here. |

 |

Keeping Hubble HappyA Bit on the Advanced Camera Upgrade
Following its historic mission and installation of $172
million of retrofit and upgrade gear, Columbia landed routinely on March 12, 2002.
The third-generation Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) camera itself is a marvel of astrophysics photography.
To achieve all this, among other things, took highly disciplined opto-electronic hardware and software engineering.
ACS represents over eight years years of design, testing, and characterization.
Click here to read the complete article.
Time Interval Measurements Getting Down to a Picosecond Single Event
Measuring single-event time intervals (TIM) to
a fraction of a nanosecond (ns) once was almost exclusively either an advanced weapons systems design
need or a high-energy physics experimental function. Very specialized markets. Even today, measuring
single-event time intervals of 1 Ns and less is not exactly duck soup. With gigahertz speeds now
commonplace, jitter rates and stability factors in general require that accurate single-event
subnanosecond time interval measurements be at hand.
See the sidebar below for more information on how to measure picosecond time
intervals.
Click here to read the complete article.
|
| |
Time Interval Measurements Getting Down to a Picosecond
Time interval measurements are made in a
repetitive or a continuous mode, a fixed-period mode, and a single-event mode. Mainly, the
resolution is mode-related. It will be apparent that the best resolution runs with accumulated
successive measurements. Conversely, the least resolution is a single-event mode.
A couplethree editionsago I described the function of a measurement comprising a
target (or unknown) value, a measured value, and a true value. These same attributes apply to
time measurements as well. To demonstrate this, let's use a hypothetical case.
We'll use microseconds for illustration. Assume we're going to measure a 1 (one) microsecond
interval. And let's establish a clock derived from a 1 MHz oscillator. We'll further set the
clock at two pulses per cycle, or two-to-one. What's more, let's assume aging and temperature
coefficients to be of no impact on the measurement. Perfect stability. Now when START (of the
TIM) is enabled, the point of enablement will be arbitrarily at a point between clock transitions.
The same for when STOP (of the TIM) is enabled. So we have a pulse train of 2 MHz (the duty cycle
is not important) to totalize our now measured time interval. Did we measure 1 µs?
Nope. It was not 1 µs. Here's why. START was enabled at an arbitrary point between clock
transitions. So was STOP. These two increments cannot be counted. (We'll stay away from the
different schemes used to account for parts of these two increments. See
SRS Application Note
#2 Making Measurements with the SR620.) So there's no chance we would have totalized
even one increment. The most we can say is that the resolution of this hypothetical case is 2
µs. In 2 µs we'll be guaranteed two full increments.
In other words, as the time interval measured approaches resolution, the error increases towards
the period of one clock increment. This error is introduced by the time variance of one increment
approaching a full interval between transitions. Remember that the functions of a measurement
comprise a target (or unknown) value, the measured value, and the true value. This should help us
to better understand the SRS specs in my TIM article (Time
Interval Measurements -- Getting Down to a Picosecond Single Event). Note where I discuss the
Stanford Research Systems (SRS) SR620. You'll see that resolution is stated in the SRS spec sheet
at 25 ps, the relative accuracy is stated as ± 50 ps, and the absolute accuracy is ± 500 ps.
This is explained further in the SRS Application Note, and if you're doing TIM you should consult the
application note. (You can download the catalog that contains the application note, or you can download the manual, or you
can request on-line info: SRS
Application Note #2 Making Measurements with the SR620.)
Click here for more information on measuring picosecond
single events. |
Digital/Analog Product Design Archive
We need
a few good EE Experts to present useful information and
perspective to other members of the EE community. Your audience
will be working engineers much like you, who value suggestions,
directions, and timely solutions to problems of the workplace.
To qualify as an EE Expert, you'll have to demonstrate knowledge
of your subjects of interest.
Click here and become
an EE Expert today! |
Guides and Experts Analog
Avenue EDA
Tools PLD DSP EDA Embedded
Systems Power Test
|
 |