ChipCenter Questlink
SEARCH CHIPCENTER
Search Type:
Search for:




Knowledge Centers
Product Reviews
Data Sheets
Guides & Experts
News
International
Ask Us
Circuit Cellar Online
App Notes
NetSeminars
Careers
Resources
FAQ
EE Times Network
Electronics Group Sites

EE Expert Darren Ashby
SpacersProduct Engineering

Click Here to Go to the Product Engineering ArchiveClick Here to Go to Darren Ashby's Main EE Expert PageClick Here to Go to the Guides and Experts Main Page

What’s in a Standard?
by Darren Ashby

Remember VHS vs. BETA? Well DVD recorders are heating up for a similar battle. Several different camps are pushing several different rewriteable formats including DVD-RW, DVD-RAM as well as Multimedia Video File (MMVF) developed by NEC. Where will it end? And who really decides what standard we will follow?

Let me relate a bit of history I recently stumbled onto that shows how a standard can come about.

The U.S. standard railroad gauge (distance between the rails) is 4 feet, 8.5 inches. That is a exceedingly odd number.

Why was that gauge used? Because that's the way they built them in England, and the US railroads were built by English expatriates.

Why did the English build them that way? Because the first rail lines were built by the same people who built the pre-railroad tramways, and that's the gauge they used.

Why did "they" use that gauge? Because the people who built the tramways used the same jigs and tools that they used for building wagons, which used that wheel spacing.

So why did the wagons have that particular odd spacing? Well, if they tried to use any other spacing, the wagon wheels would break on some of the old, long distance roads in England, because that was the spacing of the wheel ruts.

So who built those old rutted roads? The first long distance roads in Europe (and England) were built by Imperial Rome for their legions. The roads have been used ever since.

And the ruts in the roads? The ruts in the roads, which everyone had to match for fear of destroying their wagon wheels, were first formed by Roman war chariots. Since the chariots were made for (or by) Imperial Rome, they were all alike in the matter of wheel spacing.

The US standard railroad gauge of 4 feet, 8.5 inches derives from the original specification for an Imperial Roman war chariot.

Specifications and bureaucracies live forever. So the next time you are handed a specification and wonder what horse's behind (edited for the Internet) came up with it, you may be exactly right, because the Imperial Roman war chariots were made just wide enough to accommodate the back end of two war horses.

Thus we have the answer to the original question. Now for the twist to the story. When we see a space shuttle sitting on it's launching pad, there are two booster rockets attached to the side of the main fuel tank. These are solid rocket boosters, or SRB's. The SRB's are made by Thiokol at their factory in Utah. The engineers who designed the SRB's might have preferred to make them a bit fatter, but the SRB's had to be shipped by train from the factory to the launch site. The railroad line from the factory had to run through a tunnel in the mountains. The tunnel is slightly wider than the railroad track, and the railroad track is about as wide as two horses' rumps. So, a major design feature of what is arguably the worlds most advanced transportation system was determined over two thousand years ago by the width of a horse's behind (edited for the Internet).

Don't you just love engineering?

Why is it important to be on top of the standard hill? It’s pretty obvious; People will buy more of your products if they work on more stuff. Can you imagine the PC world if we wouldn’t have had a pretty common platform to share information and ideas on? I'm not a great Microsoft supporter, but I don’t think the computer era would have happened as fast if we had 30 different operating systems.

I admit there is a downside to commonality. It suppresses creativity, and locks you into a certain mode of thinking. Sometimes great upgrades have to be passed over because of no backwards compatibility.

One thing is for sure, the best design doesn’t always win. You could argue that Beta had better quality, but as most consumers wouldn’t notice and VHS was cheaper, VHS won. Sometimes you can set the standard if you are first (like Palm pilot) or if you are the biggest (like Sony), but if you don’t continue to get the consumer's money, you are bound to lose eventually.

On a final note: Sometimes it pays to get a product out the door while everyone else is arguing about the standard. If you have enough clout, go for it.

So, who will win the DVD format war? I don’t really care, but I’m gonna wait a while, cause I still have those stinkin’ Beta tapes lying around.

Product Engineering Archive

Guides and Experts   Analog Avenue   EDA Tools   PLD   DSP   EDA   Embedded Systems   Power   Test
Click here to get your listing up.

Copyright © 2003 ChipCenter-QuestLink
About ChipCenter-Questlink  Contact Us  Privacy Statement   Advertising Information  FAQ