|
 |


 
Signal Ground Drain Wire
by Dr.
Howard Johnson
Bob Kaminsky
writes:
We have a cable phenomenon
that has been puzzling us for some time now. The cable carries 4 differential,
signal pairs at 600 MHz and the connector uses a 2x5, (2-mm spacing) chicklet
construction as follows:

The cable itself uses
shielded twinaxial construction as follows:

The outer box represents
an EMI shield and is connected to chassis ground. The four inner boxes represent
a foil shield around each pair and is terminated to signal ground. The "G"
represents a "drain wire" and is normally connected to the foil
shield at both connectors and terminates into both (signal) gnd pins in the
chicklet.
The problem we are encountering is that the outer conductor of the differential
pair experiences significant rise/fall time degradation on the order of 2X
that of the inner conductors when measured single-ended. However, when we
look at a cable, which does not have the "drain wire" terminated
at either chicklet (i.e., the drain wire is floating), the rise/fall times
are much better matched. Since we already have an EMI shield around the entire
cable, I wonder if the "drain wire" is necessary.
Are there any caveats we should be aware of when leaving this wire unterminated?
Will return currents flow through the foil shield? What if the foil shield
is likewise unterminated. Why should disconnecting the "drain wire"
at the connectors have such a drastic impact on the rise/fall time of the
outer conductors?
One last puzzling item is that cables from another supplier using a similar
construction had an inverse responsethe degraded r/f times were on the
inner conductors?!
Thank you,
Bob Kaminsky
|
Reply
from Dr. Johnson:
Thanks for your interest
in High-Speed Digital Design, and for writing to me about this interesting
problem.
I am assuming that the drain wire is the ONLY connection between the individual
signal shields and the internal ground pin of the chicklet connector,
and that the individual signal shields are insulated from the outer EMC
shield and from each other.
My guess is that the drain wire connection includes some significant inductance.
You can measure this to confirm my suspicions, using a special jerry-rigged
connector. There is no cable attached to this connector. On the cable
side of the connector, just short together one signal wire (sig+) and
the drain wire, providing a length of drain wire comparable to what you
believe would be in place in an actual installed cable. Now you are blasting
a known amount of dI/dt through the connector on the signal wires, and
back through connector on the drain-wire connection to ground. Measure
the voltages present on the drain wire on the cable side of the connector.
That should give you a feeling for the significance of the drain wire
inductance.
My guess is that it will be significant. Drain wires don't usually work
well for high-speed stuff.
Now, on to your specific problem. If you drive only one of the wires of
the differential pair, the return current for that wire must flow capacitively
to the signal shield, and from there back through the shield drain wire
to ground. This current, as it passes through the inductance of the drain
wire, causes voltages on the shield. You should be able to measure these
voltages. You should also see that the shield voltages so induced differ
from one wire to the other, and from cable to cable. This is because of
subtle differences in the positions of the two signal wires with respect
to the drain wire within the connector (which affects the inductance)
and the separation between the signal shield and the outer cable shield
(which affects the capacitance). You probably will see a funny, wiggly,
resonant-looking waveform on the signal shield. My guess is that this
funny resonant signal is then coupling back to your signal wires and causing
the risetime differences that you observe. In actual operation, only the
DIFFERENCE in drive currents will excite the shield voltages, therefore
I would expect them to be reduced in amplitude. Please let me know if
my conjectures are correct.
Assuming that we have a good model for what is causing the effect, let's
move on to a solution.
Apparently, the inductance of the drain wire prevents its being useful
as a high-speed ground. It is causing some resonant behavior between the
signal shields and the outer cable ground. Therefore, we would like to
eliminate this resonance. There is a problem, however, with simply opening
the drain-wire connection. If we do that we may introduce other weird
resonant effects having to do with the floating shield. What I suggest
is that you cipher out the impedance of the transmission line formed by
the signal shield and the outer ground, and terminate each drain wire
in a resistance equal to that impedance. At that point the drain wires
won't be effective as signal shields (they aren't anyway), but neither
will the floating shields be able to resonate.
Best regards,
Dr. Howard Johnson
|
Recommended Book
Found a good book!
Alert readers informed me about this book, after my reply to one reader on the
subject of differential
transmission line impedance. At the time I said I didn't know of a good
reference on the subjectnow I do!
Brian C. Wadell, Transmission
Line Design Handbook, Artech House, 1991. ISBN: 0890064369
This book has been out there a while. I don't know how I managed to miss it.
It includes handy approximations for transmission line impedance, delay, skin
effect loss, dielectric losses, and radiation lossesvery comprehensive.
The author addresses most of the popular transmission line formats in use today,
including microstrip, buried microstrip, offset stripline, and edge- or broadside-coupled
differential striplines.
Brian heavily references the original research articles and measurements. He
doesn't pull any punches when the research is fuzzy, or in conflict. He shows
you just what we know, as well as what we don't know.
If you're looking for good approximations, this is the source.
Copyright 2001. Signal Consulting,
Inc. All Rights Reserved.
High-Speed
Digital Design Archive
Guides and Experts Analog
Avenue EDA Tools PLD DSP EDA Embedded
Systems Power Test
|
 |